00:08:51 Mike Yu: Hi all, Mike from DC 00:08:56 Regine Bendl: Austria 00:09:15 Anita Mendiratta: Hi everyone, Anita from India 00:09:17 Toyoko Sato: from Copenhagen 00:09:20 Ellis Ralph: Ellis Ralph, Fayetteville Arkansas, upstairs from Judi! 00:09:39 Dawn Fisher: Dawn Fisher, Fayetteville, AR 00:09:50 Regine Bendl: Hello from Regine from Vienna, Austria 00:10:43 Julia (she/her): Hello everyone from North Virginia 00:14:19 Kathryn NZ: Kathryn Pavlovich hello from New Zealand 00:14:19 Anil Maheshwari, Iowa: Hello everyone, from Anil Maheshwari from MIU in Iowa 00:14:32 Angela Chen: Hi Everyone! Angela Chen in Melbourne, Australia 00:14:36 Yochanan Altman: hello everyone- greetings from Europe. yochanan altman 00:14:50 Charlie Colpitts: Charlie Colpitts, Atlanta, GA 00:15:34 Shadrick Mazaza: Hello everyone, Shadrick Mazaza, Cape Town, South Africa. 00:17:05 John Odden / Newport Beach, CA, USA: Hello from John Odden in Newport Beach, CA, USA! 00:32:48 Judi Neal: What anomalous experiences have you had? 00:50:12 Dr Linne Bourget: great discussions in group 6, thank you! Dr Linne 00:51:01 Julia (she/her): We found a pattern or theme—that there can be pain, suffering, or trauma involved in these types of deep experiences. 01:00:56 ken Nishikawa: I think researcher is a evidence of social problem in action research. transforming researcher is the beginning of social change. In other words, you can change because I change. 01:01:58 Julia (she/her): Yes, action research changes the researcher too!!! 01:03:15 rex: Surely this is the essence of any change process 01:03:37 Dr Linne Bourget: Yes, Ken, very powerful, be the change you want to see and intervention bias effects from researchers is very powerful..big argument when I was in grad school but of course the found the researcher affected the research, as I predicted, being trained in metaphysics. Dr Linne 01:04:24 Dr Linne Bourget: oops sorry THey found the researcher......Dr Linne 01:05:31 Dr Linne Bourget: yes, I had a whole field of leadership downloaded to me in grad school...very lovely...Dr Linne 01:06:02 Charlie Colpitts: synesthesia 01:07:46 Dr Linne Bourget: MY friend who works with Archangels calls it claircognizance when you experience direct knowing, plus the other forms. Dr Linne 01:09:29 Judi Neal: What implications does other ways of knowing have for life and work 01:28:58 Richard Hayward: So true Judi!!! 01:29:27 Dr Linne Bourget: Yes, Judi I went through that, had to confine my disssertation to a 2x2 cell matrix model....Dr Linne 01:30:12 Julia (she/her): That is a GREAT question, Matt! 01:30:25 Dr Linne Bourget: oops dissertation (which was intuitively downloaded to me on appreciation and leadership) Dr Linne 01:30:33 Christopher Laszlo: how often have famous scientists been wrong? 01:30:44 Dawn Fisher: Must just be careful the MEANING we attach to the information. 01:30:54 Christopher Laszlo: Newton, Ptolemy, among many others 01:31:00 Richard Hayward: I had 4 supervisers, and the last one said that my whole methodology was wrong... I disagreed, and fortunately the examiner agreed with me!!!! 01:32:07 Julia (she/her): I have the perspective that when a new “knowing” happens, I let it simmer and don’t pretend to understand it. If it expands—if it gains energy over time, then I start to pay more attention to it. 01:33:09 Charlie Colpitts: do anomalous ways of knowing require anomalous proof? 01:34:02 Charlie Colpitts: sangha 01:34:13 Sauvik, India: The discussions are reminding me of the conversation between mathematicians Srinavasa Ramanujan and Hardy from Cambridge. When it was asked to Ramanujan that how did he come to all theorems which he wrote, Ramanujan's response was that those came to him as whispers in dreams by Goddess Laxmi. We all know what profound knowledge Ramanujan produced in the world of mathematics. It all came from the rough work on the temple floors he did. 01:34:16 Julia (she/her): @Charlie I don’t know if proof is a characteristic that matters—but Ken Wilber does write about confirmation. 01:35:09 Giorgia - Roma: @Sauvik that's really interesting 01:35:47 Richard Hayward: We can use crystallization as defined by Laura Ellingson rather than triangulation to give more breadth https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/engaging-crystallization-in-qualitative-research/book232059 01:35:49 Lee Robbins: And a quote from Hamlet, widely known is perhaps pertinent: “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy. 01:35:58 Sandra Waddock: Thanks, Judi. 01:37:15 Dr Linne Bourget: Thank you everyone, wonderful discussions. I always feel at home in this group, more so than the traditional world! Dr. Linne Bourget 01:37:17 Julia (she/her): Thank you, everyone. What a super, fun, and engaging discussion.