Thank you Martin for your insights. You made some great points regarding "disruptive" issues in the workplace.
Other than that, I will limit any insights I have regarding your points since I would prefer to hear what others have to say and hope not to skew their responses with mine.
Regards,
Aaron
> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:31:29 -0700
> From:
martin@MARTINRUTTE.COM> Subject: Re: Resistance to spirituality or religion in the workplace?
> To:
MSR@AOMLISTS.pace.edu>
> Aaron:
>
> The greatest point of contention is that managers are afraid that you
> will be proselytizing a certain religion or religious point of view.
> You'll try to shove your point of view down people's throats. And
> what that will do is cause upset and anger which will lead to
> potential loss of productivity/profits.
>
> In addition, managers have 'baggage' about their own religious up-
> bringing. It boils down to "When I was a kid religion did this and
> it shouldn't have." or "When I was a kid religion didn't do this and
> it should have."
>
> The counter-arguments are:
> More and more people want their spiritual/religious parts to be
> nourished at work. If we can find a way to do this in a way that
> benefited both the individual, the group and the enterprise this
> would be very useful. Recall that when similar 'disruptive' issues
> surfaced in the workplace over the years: "I'm an alcoholic." "I'm a
> drug abuser." "I'm gay." "I'm a woman." "I'm African-American.",
> managers had the same initial reaction as spirituality/religion, that
> is, they thought the issue would be highly disruptive, they didn't
> know how to handle the issue, they'd never been trained to handle
> it.....but, over time, each issue had champions who found ways to
> incorporate the issue into business in ways that were dignified,
> respectful and useful to both the individual and the enterprise.
> This issue, spirituality/religion, is the final one on the inclusion
> of the whole human being into the workplace.
>
> As to the issue of childhood baggage with respect to religion it's
> time to 'grow up' to 'adult'. By that, I mean it's time for people
> to be complete with their childhood religion. Rather than blame
> religion for something it did or didn't do when you were a kid,
> realize that religion is composed of people. People make mistakes,
> institutions make mistakes, but on the whole if we got rid of the
> institution I believe the world would be far worse off. Think of all
> the good that religion does do.
>
> To be complete with your religion can take many forms, its a
> wonderful journey. For example I've heard of ministers and rabbis
> who hold sessions in which people have the opportunity to express all
> their anger, their hurt, their rage at religion. The cleric just
> listens and 'gets it.' I've seen a session in which this was done
> and it was such a powerful healing.
>
> Another potential way to be complete is to do a brain-storming
> session on what it would take to transform the person from a
> complainer against religion to someone who decides to take on their
> religion and make it work. It's far, far easier to complain than to
> make something work, but the later is FAR more rewarding for you and
> others. I've found too many people who merely complain about
> religion and just stop there. They are unwilling to move from
> complainer to someone who makes it work.
>
> So, those are my initial reflections after about 20 years of working
> in this field.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Martin Rutte
> Chair of the Board
> The Centre for Spirituality and the Workplace
> Sobey School of Business
> Saint Mary's University
> Halifax, NS, Canada
>
>
www.spiritualityandtheworkplace.ca>
>
>
>
> On Nov 21, 2007, at 11:14 AM, Aaron Cuevas wrote:
>
> > I would like to query the MSR group to ask...
> >
> > What have you found to be the greatest point of contention
> > organizations
> > have for resisting programs aimed at spirituality or dealing with
> > religion
> > in the workplace?
> >
> > For example, did the organizations fear "religious discrimination"
> > because
> > of implied connotations?
> >
> > Be as specific as you can. Anyhow, if you can, please explain what
> > counter
> > arguements may not have been considered from the organizations
> > perspective.
> >
Get the power of Windows + Web with the new Windows Live.
Power up!