Discussion: View Thread

A good case in this month's Harpers. The line between spiritual/religious expression and infringement on others' rights

  • 1.  A good case in this month's Harpers. The line between spiritual/religious expression and infringement on others' rights

    Posted 05-12-2009 15:40
    Hi

    There is an article in this month's Harpers that would make a great
    case about the management of spirituality and religion in an
    organization. It is called "Jesus Killed Mohammed: The Crusade for a
    Christian military." It is about a spiritual movement in the U.S.
    military that in some instances interferes with the mission of the
    military, opposes religious and spiritual diversity, and infringes on
    others' spiritual/religious freedom. Interestingly enough, many who
    are part of this insist on calling themselves spiritual, not
    religious. The article's title refers to an incident where a
    relatively peaceful town in Iraq became much more violent in response
    to Mosques that had crosses spray painted on them and a Bradley
    fighting vehicle was driven around town with the phrase "Jesus killed
    Mohammed" painted on its side in Arabic. But the article is about more
    than that incident. It is about a pervasive pattern in the military.
    The article also reported "forced Christian prayer in Iraq and at
    home; combat deaths made occasions for evangelical sermons by senior
    officers; Christian apocalypse video games distributed to the troops:
    mandatory briefings on the correlation of the war to the Book of
    Revelation; exorcism designed do drive out "unclean spirits" from
    military property; beating of atheist troops that are winked at by the
    chain of command." It raises important issues about management,
    spirituality and religion. In particular--where does one draw the line
    between spiritual and religious expression and infringement on others'
    spiritual and religious freedom? How does one draw the line and what
    does one do in situations where the line is crossed?

    - Don

    ---
    Don McCormick
    Department of Management, College of Business and Economics
    California State University Northridge, Juniper Hall 4218
    18111 Nordhoff St., Northridge CA 91330
    http://www.csun.edu/~dmccormick (818) 677-2418

    “If I pass on to you what is meaningful to me, it will be a better,
    more useable chunk of stuff, than if I attempted to pass on the whole
    business, most of which was not meaningful to me.” – Charles Eames

    _______________________________________________________________________

    To send a message to the MSR Listserv, please send your email to: MSR@AOMLISTS.pace.edu

    To visit the Academy's MSR Web site, please visit: http://group.aomonline.org/msr/

    To manage you MSR Listserv subscription, please visit: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=MSR&A=1


  • 2.  A good case in this month's Harpers. The line between spiritual/religious expression and infringement on others' rights

    Posted 05-13-2009 20:05

    Hi Don,

     

    Thanks for your summary of that sobering article.  I suspect many people who think of themselves as "spiritual" are members of organized religions, and they are inclined to view other religions (and people who are members of other religions) as somewhat inferior or less in touch with what is really important.  On some level, they would prefer that members of other religions abandon those religions and join their religion.  And they may be attached to simple dogmas that are particular to their religion. 

     

    I think it would be interesting to conduct research that would probe people's feelings about spirituality and membership in an organized religion, hopefully doing it in a way that would not cause people to pose as more open-minded or tolerant than they really are.  What percentage of people -- including business people and members of this listserv -- who think of themselves as spiritual are members of organized religions?  To what degree do these people consider their religion to be superior to other religions?  To what degree and in what ways do they believe it is possible to be spiritual without being a member of a religion?  This might provide some insight into what "spiritual" really means to people.  I wonder how many people do not see a clear distinction between spirituality and membership in a particular religion.  And if they do see a clear distinction, how do they define "spirituality" and the aspects of spirituality that are independent of any particular religion?  I suspect some people believe "spiritual" merely denotes persons who give great importance to their religious beliefs as opposed to persons who say they are members of a religion but give no thought to their religion when they are not in church.  Perhaps this research has been done, but if not, it would certainly be interesting. 

     

    Tom Slocombe

     

    >>> Don McCormick <don.mccormick@CSUN.EDU> 5/12/2009 2:40 PM >>>
    Hi

    There is an article in this month's Harpers that would make a great 
    case about the management of spirituality and religion in an 
    organization. It is called "Jesus Killed Mohammed: The Crusade for a 
    Christian military." It is about a spiritual movement in the U.S. 
    military that in some instances interferes with the mission of the 
    military, opposes religious and spiritual diversity, and infringes on 
    others' spiritual/religious freedom. Interestingly enough, many who 
    are part of this insist on calling themselves spiritual, not 
    religious. The article's title refers to an incident where a 
    relatively peaceful town in Iraq became much more violent in response 
    to Mosques that had crosses spray painted on them and a Bradley 
    fighting vehicle was driven around town with the phrase "Jesus killed 
    Mohammed" painted on its side in Arabic. But the article is about more 
    than that incident. It is about a pervasive pattern in the military. 
    The article also reported "forced Christian prayer in Iraq and at 
    home; combat deaths made occasions for evangelical sermons by senior 
    officers; Christian apocalypse video games distributed to the troops: 
    mandatory briefings on the correlation of the war to the Book of 
    Revelation; exorcism designed do drive out "unclean spirits" from 
    military property; beating of atheist troops that are winked at by the 
    chain of command." It raises important issues about management, 
    spirituality and religion. In particular--where does one draw the line 
    between spiritual and religious expression and infringement on others' 
    spiritual and religious freedom? How does one draw the line and what 
    does one do in situations where the line is crossed?

    - Don

    ---
    Don McCormick
    Department of Management, College of Business and Economics
    California State University Northridge, Juniper Hall 4218
    18111 Nordhoff St., Northridge CA 91330
    http://www.csun.edu/~dmccormick  (818) 677-2418

    "If I pass on to you what is meaningful to me, it will be a better, 
    more useable chunk of stuff, than if I attempted to pass on the whole 
    business, most of which was not meaningful to me."  – Charles Eames

    _______________________________________________________________________

    To send a message to the MSR Listserv, please send your email to: MSR@AOMLISTS.pace.edu

    To visit the Academy's MSR Web site, please visit: http://group.aomonline.org/msr/

    To manage you MSR Listserv subscription, please visit: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=MSR&A=1
    _______________________________________________________________________ To send a message to the MSR Listserv, please send your email to: MSR@AOMLISTS.pace.edu To visit the Academy's MSR Web site, please visit: http://group.aomonline.org/msr/ To manage you MSR Listserv subscription, please visit: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=MSR&A=1