Dan,
There are several textbooks that focus on developing managerial/leadership skills. They all call for self-assessments and self-reflection as well as giving useful information about best, or at least good, practices in different skill areas related to management and leadership. I've been using Developing Management Skills by David Whetten and Kim Cameron for a graduate course for almost a decade. I include in the course that students practice daily a meditative type of practice to enhance their general self-awareness and that they write reflections about their skill sets, and if, what, and how they want to improve in each area of self-assessment. I'm currently teaching an online course with students who are average age 35 and mostly already in a managerial position. I consistently get thank you notes from about half of the students each term, weighted toward the higher level students, many saying they learned more in that class than in any other class they've taken. And i'm not unique: three others at our school teach the course the same way and get similar results.
There aren't enough psychologists or trained counselors around (at universities or in companies) to create these results for our business students, and helping them grow as people through enhanced self-awareness is critical to their becoming a good, or better, leader or manager. In addition, psychologists at most universities rarely teach these skills. They teach about them, but not in a way that enhances the skills themselves. We find the same issue with most courses on ethics: how much do they enhance the future ethical behavior of the business people who took those courses?
A final thought: recruiters (companies) have been asking for more soft skills from business schools over the years. They can teach the hard skills needed for particular jobs, but they're generally not suited to teach the soft skills, which they feel are important and lacking more than hard skills. Their desire for more soft skills training goes along with the research (in top journals) that shows that people skills (soft skills) are increasingly important as one moves up the corporate ladder (to management and leadership positions). Continuing to only teach the hard skills defeats the purpose and value of a business education for future managers and leaders.
Professor of Management
Management/Marketing/Entrepreneurship Dept.
Kania School of Management
University of Scranton
Scranton, PA 18510
(570) 941-7782 Office
(570) 878-2889 Cell
I am taking my course to the curriculum committee, via the Department of Management. Two faculty members contend that a leadership course should contain only what has been empirically proven and published in top tier academic journals.
One told me that stimulating students to reflect on who they are and what they believe/value should only be done by a certified clinical psychologist. (I'm not making this up.)
The existence of MSR as a legitimate part of AOM does not mean that it is accepted as a reference for building a leadership course that aims to address the whole person.
That said, I'd be grateful for any examples of similar courses that have been accepted as part of the curriculum. Or all we all operating in the margins?
Thanks,
Dan
Daniel E. Harris, MS
Executive in Residence and Managing Director
Tyson Center for Faith & Spirituality in the Workplace
WJWH 542
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, AR 72701
T: 479-575-3721
From: Management, Spirituality & Religion [mailto:MSR@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU] On Behalf Of Andre Delbecq
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 11:56 AM
To: MSR@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
Subject: Re: Query to MSR Listserv Members: let us know when you have used MSR to ground initiatives
In the early part of the last decade I often cited the presence of MSR to legitimate my attention to its concerns as being legitimate within the Academy of Management.
Senior Fellow: Ignatian Center for Jesuit Education
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Charles Thomas Tackney <
cttack@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear MSR members:
In conversation last evening with others involved in a bit of MSR history research, Stacie Chappell came up with a question so interesting I promised to post it to listserv, due credit having been noted. The questions is simple: has anyone ever referenced MSR as a basis or rationale for research? If you have, might you let us know by a reply post to the listserv itself? We may often wonder what MSR does and is, but we've really not done much to see what it has been used for by others to effect.
Thanks!
Charlie Tackney