Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  Update re: AOM Response to Travel Ban

    Posted 02-06-2017 15:30
    Dear MSR ListServ Subscribers (apologies for cross posting with the MSR Membership List): 

    Attached and embedded below (under my signature) is a message we received a few hours ago from the AOM leadership and administrative staff.  They have been in active communications with the leadership folks in the divisions and interest groups.  This message is the most recent one we have received.  You will find on-going information posted on the AOM website - aom.org.

    We support fully the actions the AOM Leadership has taken so far and further actions they have indicated they plan to take in the future.   We are somewhat aware of how deeply these events have impacted the lives, plans, and we hope not the careers of MSR and AOM members.  We greatly appreciate the work of all of those, throughout the Academy community, who are working to assist those of us severely impacted by these recent events.

    The Academy is actively working to assist folks whose lives are disrupted by these events and we want to add our efforts in your support in any way we can.  Please feel welcome to contact anyone listed in a leadership position in MSR: http://my.aom.org/leadership/toc.aspx?action=DIG&code=MSR

    We want you to know that our thanks go particularly to Anita McGahan and her colleagues, who have been amazing in their ability to respond quickly and constructively to our contacts with AOM.  Anita and the whole AOM team have been terrific (especially including Mary Ann Glynn, Nancy Urbanowicz, and Taryn Fiore to name just a few folks whose work we are aware of).

    Please feel most welcome to visit the MSR ListServ to engage in dialog regarding this situation . and other news and commentary.  (I have been having a dickens of a job getting onto the ListServ, but maybe the following address will work for you):   http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A0=MSR

    Warm regards,
    Jim
    For most and perhaps all of the MSREXEC
    ---------------------------
    On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Anita McGahan <Anita.McGahan@rotman.utoronto.ca> wrote:

    Dear Jim - I wanted to let you know that the Academy's Executive Committee last night advanced a proposal to amend the policy on political stands.  It now goes to the Board of Governors for further consideration and a vote.  The text below will be posted on the AOM website today.
    Anita

    Frequently Asked Questions
    The US President's Executive Order of January 27th on immigration and refugees has presented AOM with significant challenges in enacting our mission, which is "To build a vibrant and supportive community of scholars by markedly expanding opportunities to connect and explore ideas."   Many members, including AOM officers, are shocked, appalled and distressed.  The situation is evolving as we write this - both in the public sphere and within the AOM itself.  Below, we have assembled some information in response to the questions we've most frequently heard from members.  We are closely monitoring the evolving policy and developments and will update and expand this FAQ as more information becomes available.

    Q: I am directly affected by the policy and won't be able to travel to the U.S.  How can AOM help?
    The Academy fervently values all members, and is committed to enabling the participation on the program of members who are impacted by the recent Executive Order.  As a first step, AOM has suspended the requirement of attendance as a condition of inclusion in the program at the Annual Meeting for those affected. We are mobilizing virtual and other resources so those accepted on the program and impacted by the ban can participate in some form.   We are working to contact members in the affected countries and others who hold passports from the named countries to determine how AOM can best help.    In particular, the AOM is working with an immigration law firm to analyze the situations of affected members.  We are also in touch with several Universities that are offering 'safe harbor' to affected scholars.  If you are directly affected by the ban, please contact Taryn Fiore at tfiore@aom.org.  We are also exploring a range of member suggestions, such as intensified reliance on web-based
      technologies and video-conferencing.   If you have suggestions for other ways in which we can support and enable scholarly participation by affected scholars, please reach out to us at tfiore@aom.org.

    Q: Why didn't AOM publicly condemn the Executive Order?
    The AOM was constrained from condemning the Executive Order by a policy that bound the organization from taking a political stand (see http://aom.org/About-AOM/Governance/AOM-Policy-on-Taking-Political-Stands.aspx).  This policy bound us from commenting on the Executive Order directly on any grounds.  The policy of no-political stands binds all AOM Officers and appointed officials at the level of the Academy (e.g., editors, committee chairs, etc.), and in the Divisions/Interest Groups. No one can represent his or her personal views as those of the AOM.  The President must adhere to the policies and principles of the organization, even when she or he may disagree with them. This stance is also a central part of the AOM Board's code of conduct. Furthermore, the AOM currently has no process by which the organization as a whole can develop and express a view.

    This no-political-stands policy has a long history that emanated from the Academy's legal structure.  The Academy is a 501(c)3 organization that is chartered in the State of New York and that operates under the laws of New York and of the United States.  We are an international body in the sense that we have members from around the world, and it is our aspiration to deepen our international and global identity.  Yet formally, AOM is organized for charitable and educational purposes in New York.  We are comprised of approximately 20,000 members and a small staff of employed headquarters personnel that are charged primarily with administrative duties.  The substantive work of the AOM occurs in 23 Divisions and Interest Groups, with the Academy's Board of Governors acting as stewards and leaders in organizational governance.   As a charitable and educational organization, the AOM is structured differently than other Associations that have other forms of non-profit status, for example, a
    s 501(c)6s, which are business leagues and trade organizations; or as 501(c)4s, which are social-welfare organizations.  501(c)3s have a narrower scope for lobbying than these other forms of organization.  The legal status of a 501(c)3 includes the following restriction:  'A 501 (c) (3) organization is restricted in lobbying, which is defined as making "contacts" directed to a covered executive branch or legislative branch official for the purpose of formulating, modifying, adopting, administering or executing federal legislation, rules, executive orders, programs, policies or positions of the United States government  or nominating or confirming a person for a position subject to confirmation by the Senate' (see https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/lobbying).  The Academy's articles of incorporation say that we "will not, except to an insubstantial degree, engage in any activities or exercise any powers that are not in furtherance of [the AOM's] primary purposes."

    This formal requirement and the Academy's identity as a member-driven, pluralistic, DIGS-driven organization led the Board to adopt a policy of no political stands at least the past twenty-five years ago, and possibly much longer.  As far as we can discern, the AOM has never in its history issued a position on any matter in the public sphere, including, for example, the Vietnam War, the events of 9/11, or changes in European funding policies related to education.    

    Q: Is the Board of Governors reviewing this policy?
    Yes.

    The Academy's governance procedures require a time-consuming set of steps before a policy can be changed.  A formal proposal must first be made; the proposal must be accepted as worthy of consideration by a subcommittee; the vetting by the subcommittee must then occur; a subcommittee report must be issued with a recommendation; the report and recommendation must be deliberated in a formal meeting of the Executive Committee; if the Executive Committee adopts the recommendation, then the proposal must be advanced for consideration by the full Board of Governors; the Board of Governors may then send the proposal for further review and refinement; and ultimately, the Board of Governors, meeting with a quorum, must formally ratify the proposal before it can be adopted.

    A proposal to change the Academy's stance on no-political-stands was made before recent events.  The proposal was to allow an exception to the no-political-stands policy under certain specific circumstances.  lt was accepted for consideration and has been under analysis by a subcommittee.  The challenges include putting boundaries on when stands would be taken, and when and how stands would be developed.  We also need a process for identifying how such stands would be taken.

    Immediately after the US President's Executive Order, the subcommittee's work was accelerated and advanced to the Executive Committee.  AOM President McGahan called for extraordinary, immediate meetings of both the Executive Committee and the Board of Governors.  On February 5th, the Executive Committee met in a special session and approved a proposal to allow for a political stand when a political action threatens the Academy's purpose, existence, or function as an organization.  A recommendation has been sent to the Board on this matter, and a Board meeting will be held soon.  If adopted, the policy would be under embargo for 90 days while a task force explores how such a policy would be elaborated and implemented.  In particular, we need to develop an organizational process that incorporates member input.  We will post updated information as it arises on the proposed revisions to the Board's no-political-stances policy here.

    Q: Will AOM be moving the 2017 conference from Atlanta?
    No.

    There are a number of reasons for this.  The Executive Order effectively jeopardizes citizens of the seven named countries who are already in the United States from returning should they leave.  Of course, the Executive Order also bars members from the target countries from entering the United States.   Our best available information suggests that there may be more affected members inside the United States then outside.   We will continue to monitor this evolving situation and post additional information on this circumstance as we receive it.

    Moving the meeting under any circumstances just a few months ahead of the conference is extraordinarily difficult.  The AOM Conference is among the largest in the world of academic bodies, with approximately 10,000 attendees.   There are relatively few venues where it can be held, in particular because of our need for hundreds of concurrently available, contiguous meeting rooms and thousands of nearby hotel rooms.   In the conference field, contracts are written years in advance to reserve venues.  Our best information indicates that no alternative venue is available of sufficient size located in a country where the AOM can operate.   On top of this, we are committed contractually to Atlanta.  The AOM writes contracts with conference centers, hotels, and other bodies seven to ten years in advance.

    Q:  What about future conferences?  Will AOM hold future conferences outside the United States?
    Yes.  The Annual Meeting will be in Vancouver, Canada, in 2020.  The schedule of future Annual Meetings is at http://aom.org/Meetings/Future-Meetings.aspx .   In addition, specialized AOM conferences will be held outside North America.

    The initiative on specialized conferences will offer members opportunities to gather at thematic and experiential conferences in locations outside of North America.  We invite you to take part in these new conferences and consider submitting a proposal to hold such an event. Please see our website at https://aom.org/Meetings/Specialized-Conferences-Initiative.aspx for information on this initiative.  

    Some members have suggested that the AOM's Annual Meeting be held in countries other than the United States and Canada.  We are vigilantly open to new possibilities.

    Q:  Will we be discussing these issues at the 2017 conference in Atlanta?
    Yes.

    The 2017 theme, "At the Interface," provides many opportunities for academic scholarship to address issues related to borders and the policies that affect them.  To advance this scholarly agenda, plans are on the drawing board about sessions along these lines.  Division and Interest Groups are considering ways in which they will respond.    This initiative is evolving.  We will be posting updates here as they arise.

    Q:  I'm frustrated, and am thinking of boycotting the meeting in Atlanta as a protest against the Executive Order.  What do you have to say about that?
    We understand your frustration, and yet we hope that you will attend.  It is our view that this is a time for strengthening institutions of science.   We need your ideas, views, and energetic participation in the conversation in Atlanta.  We need to advance our collective scholarship on, for example, the importance of academic freedom and scholarly exchange.  It is critically important that, under the principles of academic integrity, we express what is true and right.   The mission of the Academy is to "To build a vibrant and supportive community of scholars by markedly expanding opportunities to connect and explore ideas."   By attending, you strengthen that mission and community and contribute greatly to support the scholars who engage in it.   This is a time for us to unify, improve and strengthen AOM, which we need your help to accomplish.



  • 2.  Update AOM Response to Travel Ban

    Posted 02-07-2017 01:48
    Dear MSR members:

    CMS listserv has this item from the HRM Division Executive last evening, copied here for our information:

    HR Division Response to the U.S. Executive Order on Immigration and Travel from Seven Countries

     As most of you know, one week ago the U.S. instituted a temporary travel and immigration ban into the U.S. from seven countries (Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen). Like many of you, as individuals we have experienced strong reactions to this ban. As officers of the Human Resources Division of the Academy of Management, we want to first and foremost communicate that we recognize that this travel ban policy undermines our ability to fulfill the core mission of the Division, which is the "encouragement of professional scholarship in personnel and human resource topics by interested members of the Division and other members of AOM, dissemination of results of this scholarship, provision for fellowship among persons with professional interests in HR topics, and engaging in related professional activities of interest to the membership." In particular, the travel ban policy makes it more difficult for scholars to have access to fellow colleagues and engage in professional activities, be it attending a conference or traveling to the U.S. to work with a colleague on research. An international travel ban such as this also impedes our current Division goal of increasing engagement with our international members. While there will still be many legal proceedings to follow and the situation is fluid, it is hopeful that one federal court in the state of Washington, this past Friday, ruled that the travel ban policy should be suspended barring further evidence for the ban's necessity.

     As this situation develops, we want to reassure all members that the HR Division will not let this travel ban disrupt our commitment to our members or our current mission, goals, and strategies. The HR Division strongly believes that international diversity is paramount for our members to be able to produce quality scholarship and educate students to be future global leaders. Over the past several years, our division has been a leader in the Academy of Management regarding inclusion of our global membership. We founded and continue to greatly expand our ambassadors program, we have held two international conferences (one in Beijing and one in Sydney; and are currently seeking proposals for the next international conference) in an attempt to bring the AOM to our members who have difficulty attending a U.S. conference, and we have increased the number of international members represented on the executive committee.

     We are fully committed to providing support and assistance to any members whose scholarly activities are impeded by this travel ban, including technology support for virtual presentations of accepted papers where members are unable to attend because of this travel ban. To that end, we will be sending out a survey link soon asking all members to provide input and advice on what else the Division officers or HR ambassadors can do to help those affected by the travel ban (please look for this survey email within the next week and then for a follow-up  email on the resulting action plan).  Additionally, the HR officers will be holding a "town-hall" style meeting/discussion during our plenary session at the annual meeting in Atlanta; we encourage members to come and discuss what role the division should play in public policy and activism as well as other issues that may emerge in the near future. Any member is also welcome to email the current Division Chair with ideas or concerns (maria-kraimer@uiowa.edu<mailto:maria-kraimer@uiowa.edu>). We, the HR officers, are and will continue to communicate with AOM leaders to represent our Division members' views on this issue and to advocate for AOM to take a stronger position nationally in terms of how such travel bans impact scientific research, education, and academic freedom.

     At this time, it is important to remember that scientific advances in the field of HR, including those that can actually help address the increasingly complex work and employment issues at the heart of many current global political events, will be more likely to occur if the HR Division members stand together in solidarity.  We look forward to engaging all division members in conversations on how we can do that together.

     

    Maria Kraimer, Division Chair

    Deidra Schleicher, Division Chair-Elect

    Ingrid Fulmer, Program Chair

    Chris Rosen, PDW Chair

    David Lepak, Past Division Chair

     

    The Human Resource (HR) Division (http://www.hrdiv.org) is dedicated to a better understanding of how work organizations can perform more effectively by better management of their human resources.


    On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Stacie Chappell <stacie.chappell@wne.edu> wrote:
    Dear MSR ListServ Subscribers (apologies for cross posting with the MSR Membership List): 

    Attached and embedded below (under my signature) is a message we received a few hours ago from the AOM leadership and administrative staff.  They have been in active communications with the leadership folks in the divisions and interest groups.  This message is the most recent one we have received.  You will find on-going information posted on the AOM website - aom.org.

    We support fully the actions the AOM Leadership has taken so far and further actions they have indicated they plan to take in the future.   We are somewhat aware of how deeply these events have impacted the lives, plans, and we hope not the careers of MSR and AOM members.  We greatly appreciate the work of all of those, throughout the Academy community, who are working to assist those of us severely impacted by these recent events.

    The Academy is actively working to assist folks whose lives are disrupted by these events and we want to add our efforts in your support in any way we can.  Please feel welcome to contact anyone listed in a leadership position in MSR: http://my.aom.org/leadership/toc.aspx?action=DIG&code=MSR

    We want you to know that our thanks go particularly to Anita McGahan and her colleagues, who have been amazing in their ability to respond quickly and constructively to our contacts with AOM.  Anita and the whole AOM team have been terrific (especially including Mary Ann Glynn, Nancy Urbanowicz, and Taryn Fiore to name just a few folks whose work we are aware of).

    Please feel most welcome to visit the MSR ListServ to engage in dialog regarding this situation . and other news and commentary.  (I have been having a dickens of a job getting onto the ListServ, but maybe the following address will work for you):   http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A0=MSR

    Warm regards,
    Jim
    For most and perhaps all of the MSREXEC
    ---------------------------
    On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Anita McGahan <Anita.McGahan@rotman.utoronto.ca> wrote:

    Dear Jim - I wanted to let you know that the Academy's Executive Committee last night advanced a proposal to amend the policy on political stands.  It now goes to the Board of Governors for further consideration and a vote.  The text below will be posted on the AOM website today.
    Anita

    Frequently Asked Questions
    The US President's Executive Order of January 27th on immigration and refugees has presented AOM with significant challenges in enacting our mission, which is "To build a vibrant and supportive community of scholars by markedly expanding opportunities to connect and explore ideas."   Many members, including AOM officers, are shocked, appalled and distressed.  The situation is evolving as we write this - both in the public sphere and within the AOM itself.  Below, we have assembled some information in response to the questions we've most frequently heard from members.  We are closely monitoring the evolving policy and developments and will update and expand this FAQ as more information becomes available.

    Q: I am directly affected by the policy and won't be able to travel to the U.S.  How can AOM help?
    The Academy fervently values all members, and is committed to enabling the participation on the program of members who are impacted by the recent Executive Order.  As a first step, AOM has suspended the requirement of attendance as a condition of inclusion in the program at the Annual Meeting for those affected. We are mobilizing virtual and other resources so those accepted on the program and impacted by the ban can participate in some form.   We are working to contact members in the affected countries and others who hold passports from the named countries to determine how AOM can best help.    In particular, the AOM is working with an immigration law firm to analyze the situations of affected members.  We are also in touch with several Universities that are offering 'safe harbor' to affected scholars.  If you are directly affected by the ban, please contact Taryn Fiore at tfiore@aom.org.  We are also exploring a range of member suggestions, such as intensified reliance on web-based
      technologies and video-conferencing.   If you have suggestions for other ways in which we can support and enable scholarly participation by affected scholars, please reach out to us at tfiore@aom.org.

    Q: Why didn't AOM publicly condemn the Executive Order?
    The AOM was constrained from condemning the Executive Order by a policy that bound the organization from taking a political stand (see http://aom.org/About-AOM/Governance/AOM-Policy-on-Taking-Political-Stands.aspx).  This policy bound us from commenting on the Executive Order directly on any grounds.  The policy of no-political stands binds all AOM Officers and appointed officials at the level of the Academy (e.g., editors, committee chairs, etc.), and in the Divisions/Interest Groups. No one can represent his or her personal views as those of the AOM.  The President must adhere to the policies and principles of the organization, even when she or he may disagree with them. This stance is also a central part of the AOM Board's code of conduct. Furthermore, the AOM currently has no process by which the organization as a whole can develop and express a view.

    This no-political-stands policy has a long history that emanated from the Academy's legal structure.  The Academy is a 501(c)3 organization that is chartered in the State of New York and that operates under the laws of New York and of the United States.  We are an international body in the sense that we have members from around the world, and it is our aspiration to deepen our international and global identity.  Yet formally, AOM is organized for charitable and educational purposes in New York.  We are comprised of approximately 20,000 members and a small staff of employed headquarters personnel that are charged primarily with administrative duties.  The substantive work of the AOM occurs in 23 Divisions and Interest Groups, with the Academy's Board of Governors acting as stewards and leaders in organizational governance.   As a charitable and educational organization, the AOM is structured differently than other Associations that have other forms of non-profit status, for example, a
    s 501(c)6s, which are business leagues and trade organizations; or as 501(c)4s, which are social-welfare organizations.  501(c)3s have a narrower scope for lobbying than these other forms of organization.  The legal status of a 501(c)3 includes the following restriction:  'A 501 (c) (3) organization is restricted in lobbying, which is defined as making "contacts" directed to a covered executive branch or legislative branch official for the purpose of formulating, modifying, adopting, administering or executing federal legislation, rules, executive orders, programs, policies or positions of the United States government  or nominating or confirming a person for a position subject to confirmation by the Senate' (see https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/lobbying).  The Academy's articles of incorporation say that we "will not, except to an insubstantial degree, engage in any activities or exercise any powers that are not in furtherance of [the AOM's] primary purposes."

    This formal requirement and the Academy's identity as a member-driven, pluralistic, DIGS-driven organization led the Board to adopt a policy of no political stands at least the past twenty-five years ago, and possibly much longer.  As far as we can discern, the AOM has never in its history issued a position on any matter in the public sphere, including, for example, the Vietnam War, the events of 9/11, or changes in European funding policies related to education.    

    Q: Is the Board of Governors reviewing this policy?
    Yes.

    The Academy's governance procedures require a time-consuming set of steps before a policy can be changed.  A formal proposal must first be made; the proposal must be accepted as worthy of consideration by a subcommittee; the vetting by the subcommittee must then occur; a subcommittee report must be issued with a recommendation; the report and recommendation must be deliberated in a formal meeting of the Executive Committee; if the Executive Committee adopts the recommendation, then the proposal must be advanced for consideration by the full Board of Governors; the Board of Governors may then send the proposal for further review and refinement; and ultimately, the Board of Governors, meeting with a quorum, must formally ratify the proposal before it can be adopted.

    A proposal to change the Academy's stance on no-political-stands was made before recent events.  The proposal was to allow an exception to the no-political-stands policy under certain specific circumstances.  lt was accepted for consideration and has been under analysis by a subcommittee.  The challenges include putting boundaries on when stands would be taken, and when and how stands would be developed.  We also need a process for identifying how such stands would be taken.

    Immediately after the US President's Executive Order, the subcommittee's work was accelerated and advanced to the Executive Committee.  AOM President McGahan called for extraordinary, immediate meetings of both the Executive Committee and the Board of Governors.  On February 5th, the Executive Committee met in a special session and approved a proposal to allow for a political stand when a political action threatens the Academy's purpose, existence, or function as an organization.  A recommendation has been sent to the Board on this matter, and a Board meeting will be held soon.  If adopted, the policy would be under embargo for 90 days while a task force explores how such a policy would be elaborated and implemented.  In particular, we need to develop an organizational process that incorporates member input.  We will post updated information as it arises on the proposed revisions to the Board's no-political-stances policy here.

    Q: Will AOM be moving the 2017 conference from Atlanta?
    No.

    There are a number of reasons for this.  The Executive Order effectively jeopardizes citizens of the seven named countries who are already in the United States from returning should they leave.  Of course, the Executive Order also bars members from the target countries from entering the United States.   Our best available information suggests that there may be more affected members inside the United States then outside.   We will continue to monitor this evolving situation and post additional information on this circumstance as we receive it.

    Moving the meeting under any circumstances just a few months ahead of the conference is extraordinarily difficult.  The AOM Conference is among the largest in the world of academic bodies, with approximately 10,000 attendees.   There are relatively few venues where it can be held, in particular because of our need for hundreds of concurrently available, contiguous meeting rooms and thousands of nearby hotel rooms.   In the conference field, contracts are written years in advance to reserve venues.  Our best information indicates that no alternative venue is available of sufficient size located in a country where the AOM can operate.   On top of this, we are committed contractually to Atlanta.  The AOM writes contracts with conference centers, hotels, and other bodies seven to ten years in advance.

    Q:  What about future conferences?  Will AOM hold future conferences outside the United States?
    Yes.  The Annual Meeting will be in Vancouver, Canada, in 2020.  The schedule of future Annual Meetings is at http://aom.org/Meetings/Future-Meetings.aspx .   In addition, specialized AOM conferences will be held outside North America.

    The initiative on specialized conferences will offer members opportunities to gather at thematic and experiential conferences in locations outside of North America.  We invite you to take part in these new conferences and consider submitting a proposal to hold such an event. Please see our website at https://aom.org/Meetings/Specialized-Conferences-Initiative.aspx for information on this initiative.  

    Some members have suggested that the AOM's Annual Meeting be held in countries other than the United States and Canada.  We are vigilantly open to new possibilities.

    Q:  Will we be discussing these issues at the 2017 conference in Atlanta?
    Yes.

    The 2017 theme, "At the Interface," provides many opportunities for academic scholarship to address issues related to borders and the policies that affect them.  To advance this scholarly agenda, plans are on the drawing board about sessions along these lines.  Division and Interest Groups are considering ways in which they will respond.    This initiative is evolving.  We will be posting updates here as they arise.

    Q:  I'm frustrated, and am thinking of boycotting the meeting in Atlanta as a protest against the Executive Order.  What do you have to say about that?
    We understand your frustration, and yet we hope that you will attend.  It is our view that this is a time for strengthening institutions of science.   We need your ideas, views, and energetic participation in the conversation in Atlanta.  We need to advance our collective scholarship on, for example, the importance of academic freedom and scholarly exchange.  It is critically important that, under the principles of academic integrity, we express what is true and right.   The mission of the Academy is to "To build a vibrant and supportive community of scholars by markedly expanding opportunities to connect and explore ideas."   By attending, you strengthen that mission and community and contribute greatly to support the scholars who engage in it.   This is a time for us to unify, improve and strengthen AOM, which we need your help to accomplish.




  • 3.  Update AOM Response to Travel Ban

    Posted 02-07-2017 06:51
    Dear MSR listserv members:

    This is just in on the CMS listserv, which seems important enough to share here for general information. 

    Dear colleagues,

    In all, we had 105 responses to the CMS Division member survey on the US travel ban and the AOM response to it; our thanks to everyone who participated.  Here is a link to the document containing all of the comments, ideas and suggestions we received <http://cms.aom.org/wp-content/uploads/CMS-Division-Travel-Ban-report-survey.pdf>

    We have used the comments, ideas and suggestions as a basis for a statement of intended action:

    *++ CMS Division Statement of Intended Action ++*

    Feedback from CMS Division membership overwhelmingly condemns the AOM President's statement as inadequate. The travel ban is perceived by many as fundamentally unethical in terms of the AOM's own Code of Ethics <http://aom.org/About-AOM/Code-of-Ethics.aspx>. The travel ban, and failure to speak out against it, also runs contrary to the domain statement of the CMS Division <http://cms.aom.org/domain-statement/> as an academic community that challenges racial inequality and discrimination through scholarship and education. Among those affected by the ban are CMS Division members, including some who may be prevented from attending the 2017 Annual Meeting. As a member-led organization, we see it as our responsibility to act in solidarity with our members. We therefore propose to use this document as a basis from which to challenge the adequacy of the AOM response to the travel ban, and to work with other AOM Divisions to call for change in the interests of our members.

    Building on the views expressed by CMS Division members in our survey, we propose to:

    ·  Call on the AOM Board to revise their position on the Executive Order, including via online petition <https://www.change.org/p/president-mcgahan-preserve-the-values-of-inclusion-and-diversity-at-the-aom?recruiter=76113186&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=autopublish&utm_term=des-lg-share_petition-no_msg>;

    ·  Call on the AOM Board for an immediate removal of the AOM Policy on Taking Political Stands <http://aom.org/About-AOM/Governance/AOM-Policy-on-Taking-Political-Stands.aspx> which prevents officers and leaders (including within Divisions) from taking publicly stated political stands on any issue;

     ·  Call on the AOM Board for an Emergency Open Meeting at the start of the

    2017 AOM meeting, in place of the Welcome Reception, to discuss the Executive Order and the AOM President's response to it and to ask for an account of the process through which this response was assembled;

     ·  Work together with Executive groups and members of other Divisions/SIGs towards action on these issues;

    ·  We are committed to providing the PDW and Main Programs at the 2017 meeting and to run the 2017 CMS Division Elections, to honor the colleagues who have worked to write and submit their work to AOM who still wish to attend and present. We will also work to expand scope for virtual participation and argue for fee waivers for those affected by the travel ban;

    ·  If insufficient progress is made towards change on these issues, we commit to returning to CMS Division membership to canvas further, especially on collective, up to and including the possibility of a boycott or Division disbanding.

    *CMS Executive 2016-2017*

    *Emma Bell, Division Past Co-chair; Scott Taylor, Division Past Co-chair; Nimruji Jammulamadaka, Division Co-chair; Latha Poonamallee, Division Co-chair; Paul Donnelly, Division Co-chair Elect; Banu Ozkazanc-Pan, Division Co-chair Elect; Mark Learmonth, Main Program Chair; Stephen Cummings, Professional Development Workshop Co-chair; Ajnesh Prasad, Professional Development Workshop Co-chair; Nadia deGama, Representative-at-large; Sarah Gilmore, Representative-at-large; Rosalie Hilde, Treasurer; Patrizia Hoyer, Representative-at-large; Jonathan Murphy, Representative-at-large.*

    __

    This email originated from DIT. If you received this email in error, please delete it from your system. Please note that if you are not the named addressee, disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action based on the contents of this email or attachments is prohibited. www.dit.ie

    Is ó ITBÁC a tháinig an ríomhphost seo. Má fuair tú an ríomhphost seo trí earráid, scrios de do chóras é le do thoil. Tabhair ar aird, mura tú an seolaí ainmnithe, go bhfuil dianchosc ar aon nochtadh, aon chóipeáil, aon dáileadh nó ar aon ghníomh a dhéanfar bunaithe ar an ábhar atá sa ríomhphost nó sna hiatáin seo. www.dit.ie

    Tá ITBÁC ag aistriú go Gráinseach Ghormáin – DIT is on the move to Grangegorman <http://www.dit.ie/grangegorman>


    On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Charles Tackney <cttack@gmail.com> wrote:
    Dear MSR members:

    CMS listserv has this item from the HRM Division Executive last evening, copied here for our information:

    HR Division Response to the U.S. Executive Order on Immigration and Travel from Seven Countries

     As most of you know, one week ago the U.S. instituted a temporary travel and immigration ban into the U.S. from seven countries (Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen). Like many of you, as individuals we have experienced strong reactions to this ban. As officers of the Human Resources Division of the Academy of Management, we want to first and foremost communicate that we recognize that this travel ban policy undermines our ability to fulfill the core mission of the Division, which is the "encouragement of professional scholarship in personnel and human resource topics by interested members of the Division and other members of AOM, dissemination of results of this scholarship, provision for fellowship among persons with professional interests in HR topics, and engaging in related professional activities of interest to the membership." In particular, the travel ban policy makes it more difficult for scholars to have access to fellow colleagues and engage in professional activities, be it attending a conference or traveling to the U.S. to work with a colleague on research. An international travel ban such as this also impedes our current Division goal of increasing engagement with our international members. While there will still be many legal proceedings to follow and the situation is fluid, it is hopeful that one federal court in the state of Washington, this past Friday, ruled that the travel ban policy should be suspended barring further evidence for the ban's necessity.

     As this situation develops, we want to reassure all members that the HR Division will not let this travel ban disrupt our commitment to our members or our current mission, goals, and strategies. The HR Division strongly believes that international diversity is paramount for our members to be able to produce quality scholarship and educate students to be future global leaders. Over the past several years, our division has been a leader in the Academy of Management regarding inclusion of our global membership. We founded and continue to greatly expand our ambassadors program, we have held two international conferences (one in Beijing and one in Sydney; and are currently seeking proposals for the next international conference) in an attempt to bring the AOM to our members who have difficulty attending a U.S. conference, and we have increased the number of international members represented on the executive committee.

     We are fully committed to providing support and assistance to any members whose scholarly activities are impeded by this travel ban, including technology support for virtual presentations of accepted papers where members are unable to attend because of this travel ban. To that end, we will be sending out a survey link soon asking all members to provide input and advice on what else the Division officers or HR ambassadors can do to help those affected by the travel ban (please look for this survey email within the next week and then for a follow-up  email on the resulting action plan).  Additionally, the HR officers will be holding a "town-hall" style meeting/discussion during our plenary session at the annual meeting in Atlanta; we encourage members to come and discuss what role the division should play in public policy and activism as well as other issues that may emerge in the near future. Any member is also welcome to email the current Division Chair with ideas or concerns (maria-kraimer@uiowa.edu<mailto:maria-kraimer@uiowa.edu>). We, the HR officers, are and will continue to communicate with AOM leaders to represent our Division members' views on this issue and to advocate for AOM to take a stronger position nationally in terms of how such travel bans impact scientific research, education, and academic freedom.

     At this time, it is important to remember that scientific advances in the field of HR, including those that can actually help address the increasingly complex work and employment issues at the heart of many current global political events, will be more likely to occur if the HR Division members stand together in solidarity.  We look forward to engaging all division members in conversations on how we can do that together.

     

    Maria Kraimer, Division Chair

    Deidra Schleicher, Division Chair-Elect

    Ingrid Fulmer, Program Chair

    Chris Rosen, PDW Chair

    David Lepak, Past Division Chair

     

    The Human Resource (HR) Division (http://www.hrdiv.org) is dedicated to a better understanding of how work organizations can perform more effectively by better management of their human resources.


    On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Stacie Chappell <stacie.chappell@wne.edu> wrote:
    Dear MSR ListServ Subscribers (apologies for cross posting with the MSR Membership List): 

    Attached and embedded below (under my signature) is a message we received a few hours ago from the AOM leadership and administrative staff.  They have been in active communications with the leadership folks in the divisions and interest groups.  This message is the most recent one we have received.  You will find on-going information posted on the AOM website - aom.org.

    We support fully the actions the AOM Leadership has taken so far and further actions they have indicated they plan to take in the future.   We are somewhat aware of how deeply these events have impacted the lives, plans, and we hope not the careers of MSR and AOM members.  We greatly appreciate the work of all of those, throughout the Academy community, who are working to assist those of us severely impacted by these recent events.

    The Academy is actively working to assist folks whose lives are disrupted by these events and we want to add our efforts in your support in any way we can.  Please feel welcome to contact anyone listed in a leadership position in MSR: http://my.aom.org/leadership/toc.aspx?action=DIG&code=MSR

    We want you to know that our thanks go particularly to Anita McGahan and her colleagues, who have been amazing in their ability to respond quickly and constructively to our contacts with AOM.  Anita and the whole AOM team have been terrific (especially including Mary Ann Glynn, Nancy Urbanowicz, and Taryn Fiore to name just a few folks whose work we are aware of).

    Please feel most welcome to visit the MSR ListServ to engage in dialog regarding this situation . and other news and commentary.  (I have been having a dickens of a job getting onto the ListServ, but maybe the following address will work for you):   http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A0=MSR

    Warm regards,
    Jim
    For most and perhaps all of the MSREXEC
    ---------------------------
    On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Anita McGahan <Anita.McGahan@rotman.utoronto.ca> wrote:

    Dear Jim - I wanted to let you know that the Academy's Executive Committee last night advanced a proposal to amend the policy on political stands.  It now goes to the Board of Governors for further consideration and a vote.  The text below will be posted on the AOM website today.
    Anita

    Frequently Asked Questions
    The US President's Executive Order of January 27th on immigration and refugees has presented AOM with significant challenges in enacting our mission, which is "To build a vibrant and supportive community of scholars by markedly expanding opportunities to connect and explore ideas."   Many members, including AOM officers, are shocked, appalled and distressed.  The situation is evolving as we write this - both in the public sphere and within the AOM itself.  Below, we have assembled some information in response to the questions we've most frequently heard from members.  We are closely monitoring the evolving policy and developments and will update and expand this FAQ as more information becomes available.

    Q: I am directly affected by the policy and won't be able to travel to the U.S.  How can AOM help?
    The Academy fervently values all members, and is committed to enabling the participation on the program of members who are impacted by the recent Executive Order.  As a first step, AOM has suspended the requirement of attendance as a condition of inclusion in the program at the Annual Meeting for those affected. We are mobilizing virtual and other resources so those accepted on the program and impacted by the ban can participate in some form.   We are working to contact members in the affected countries and others who hold passports from the named countries to determine how AOM can best help.    In particular, the AOM is working with an immigration law firm to analyze the situations of affected members.  We are also in touch with several Universities that are offering 'safe harbor' to affected scholars.  If you are directly affected by the ban, please contact Taryn Fiore at tfiore@aom.org.  We are also exploring a range of member suggestions, such as intensified reliance on web-based
      technologies and video-conferencing.   If you have suggestions for other ways in which we can support and enable scholarly participation by affected scholars, please reach out to us at tfiore@aom.org.

    Q: Why didn't AOM publicly condemn the Executive Order?
    The AOM was constrained from condemning the Executive Order by a policy that bound the organization from taking a political stand (see http://aom.org/About-AOM/Governance/AOM-Policy-on-Taking-Political-Stands.aspx).  This policy bound us from commenting on the Executive Order directly on any grounds.  The policy of no-political stands binds all AOM Officers and appointed officials at the level of the Academy (e.g., editors, committee chairs, etc.), and in the Divisions/Interest Groups. No one can represent his or her personal views as those of the AOM.  The President must adhere to the policies and principles of the organization, even when she or he may disagree with them. This stance is also a central part of the AOM Board's code of conduct. Furthermore, the AOM currently has no process by which the organization as a whole can develop and express a view.

    This no-political-stands policy has a long history that emanated from the Academy's legal structure.  The Academy is a 501(c)3 organization that is chartered in the State of New York and that operates under the laws of New York and of the United States.  We are an international body in the sense that we have members from around the world, and it is our aspiration to deepen our international and global identity.  Yet formally, AOM is organized for charitable and educational purposes in New York.  We are comprised of approximately 20,000 members and a small staff of employed headquarters personnel that are charged primarily with administrative duties.  The substantive work of the AOM occurs in 23 Divisions and Interest Groups, with the Academy's Board of Governors acting as stewards and leaders in organizational governance.   As a charitable and educational organization, the AOM is structured differently than other Associations that have other forms of non-profit status, for example, a
    s 501(c)6s, which are business leagues and trade organizations; or as 501(c)4s, which are social-welfare organizations.  501(c)3s have a narrower scope for lobbying than these other forms of organization.  The legal status of a 501(c)3 includes the following restriction:  'A 501 (c) (3) organization is restricted in lobbying, which is defined as making "contacts" directed to a covered executive branch or legislative branch official for the purpose of formulating, modifying, adopting, administering or executing federal legislation, rules, executive orders, programs, policies or positions of the United States government  or nominating or confirming a person for a position subject to confirmation by the Senate' (see https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/lobbying).  The Academy's articles of incorporation say that we "will not, except to an insubstantial degree, engage in any activities or exercise any powers that are not in furtherance of [the AOM's] primary purposes."

    This formal requirement and the Academy's identity as a member-driven, pluralistic, DIGS-driven organization led the Board to adopt a policy of no political stands at least the past twenty-five years ago, and possibly much longer.  As far as we can discern, the AOM has never in its history issued a position on any matter in the public sphere, including, for example, the Vietnam War, the events of 9/11, or changes in European funding policies related to education.    

    Q: Is the Board of Governors reviewing this policy?
    Yes.

    The Academy's governance procedures require a time-consuming set of steps before a policy can be changed.  A formal proposal must first be made; the proposal must be accepted as worthy of consideration by a subcommittee; the vetting by the subcommittee must then occur; a subcommittee report must be issued with a recommendation; the report and recommendation must be deliberated in a formal meeting of the Executive Committee; if the Executive Committee adopts the recommendation, then the proposal must be advanced for consideration by the full Board of Governors; the Board of Governors may then send the proposal for further review and refinement; and ultimately, the Board of Governors, meeting with a quorum, must formally ratify the proposal before it can be adopted.

    A proposal to change the Academy's stance on no-political-stands was made before recent events.  The proposal was to allow an exception to the no-political-stands policy under certain specific circumstances.  lt was accepted for consideration and has been under analysis by a subcommittee.  The challenges include putting boundaries on when stands would be taken, and when and how stands would be developed.  We also need a process for identifying how such stands would be taken.

    Immediately after the US President's Executive Order, the subcommittee's work was accelerated and advanced to the Executive Committee.  AOM President McGahan called for extraordinary, immediate meetings of both the Executive Committee and the Board of Governors.  On February 5th, the Executive Committee met in a special session and approved a proposal to allow for a political stand when a political action threatens the Academy's purpose, existence, or function as an organization.  A recommendation has been sent to the Board on this matter, and a Board meeting will be held soon.  If adopted, the policy would be under embargo for 90 days while a task force explores how such a policy would be elaborated and implemented.  In particular, we need to develop an organizational process that incorporates member input.  We will post updated information as it arises on the proposed revisions to the Board's no-political-stances policy here.

    Q: Will AOM be moving the 2017 conference from Atlanta?
    No.

    There are a number of reasons for this.  The Executive Order effectively jeopardizes citizens of the seven named countries who are already in the United States from returning should they leave.  Of course, the Executive Order also bars members from the target countries from entering the United States.   Our best available information suggests that there may be more affected members inside the United States then outside.   We will continue to monitor this evolving situation and post additional information on this circumstance as we receive it.

    Moving the meeting under any circumstances just a few months ahead of the conference is extraordinarily difficult.  The AOM Conference is among the largest in the world of academic bodies, with approximately 10,000 attendees.   There are relatively few venues where it can be held, in particular because of our need for hundreds of concurrently available, contiguous meeting rooms and thousands of nearby hotel rooms.   In the conference field, contracts are written years in advance to reserve venues.  Our best information indicates that no alternative venue is available of sufficient size located in a country where the AOM can operate.   On top of this, we are committed contractually to Atlanta.  The AOM writes contracts with conference centers, hotels, and other bodies seven to ten years in advance.

    Q:  What about future conferences?  Will AOM hold future conferences outside the United States?
    Yes.  The Annual Meeting will be in Vancouver, Canada, in 2020.  The schedule of future Annual Meetings is at http://aom.org/Meetings/Future-Meetings.aspx .   In addition, specialized AOM conferences will be held outside North America.

    The initiative on specialized conferences will offer members opportunities to gather at thematic and experiential conferences in locations outside of North America.  We invite you to take part in these new conferences and consider submitting a proposal to hold such an event. Please see our website at https://aom.org/Meetings/Specialized-Conferences-Initiative.aspx for information on this initiative.  

    Some members have suggested that the AOM's Annual Meeting be held in countries other than the United States and Canada.  We are vigilantly open to new possibilities.

    Q:  Will we be discussing these issues at the 2017 conference in Atlanta?
    Yes.

    The 2017 theme, "At the Interface," provides many opportunities for academic scholarship to address issues related to borders and the policies that affect them.  To advance this scholarly agenda, plans are on the drawing board about sessions along these lines.  Division and Interest Groups are considering ways in which they will respond.    This initiative is evolving.  We will be posting updates here as they arise.

    Q:  I'm frustrated, and am thinking of boycotting the meeting in Atlanta as a protest against the Executive Order.  What do you have to say about that?
    We understand your frustration, and yet we hope that you will attend.  It is our view that this is a time for strengthening institutions of science.   We need your ideas, views, and energetic participation in the conversation in Atlanta.  We need to advance our collective scholarship on, for example, the importance of academic freedom and scholarly exchange.  It is critically important that, under the principles of academic integrity, we express what is true and right.   The mission of the Academy is to "To build a vibrant and supportive community of scholars by markedly expanding opportunities to connect and explore ideas."   By attending, you strengthen that mission and community and contribute greatly to support the scholars who engage in it.   This is a time for us to unify, improve and strengthen AOM, which we need your help to accomplish.